After Mahasamadhi #2
I do not agree with the editorial homework that draws the conclusion that 7th Stage Realization cannot be validated, now that Adi Da Love Ananda has died (see link below).
Based on Adi Da’s complex and nuanced life, intimacies, his teaching demonstration, gifts and means of "Bright" Realization, including the beginning foundation of responsiveness to him, this editorial is not “honest, true and fair" (unbiased).
There is no scholarly homework nor the use of conventionally interpretive language that is capable of effectively communicating about the validation of nor the disproving of the eternally living process of "Bright" Divine-Self Realization.
I ask, who is this communication (“Adidam after Mahasamadhi”) speaking to and why (for what purpose)?
Does this summary actually provide an accurate ("honest, true and fair") historical account of Adi Da and the world wide response to him?
Is this editorial (“Adidam after Mahasamadhi”) an intentional "mummery play", intended to reflect the error of non-recognition?
Is it a limited, egoic view of Adi Da's Freely Given Gift of the Irrevocably Established (now to forever be Noticed) Realization of ONE and ONLY Divine-Self Reality Truth and Process, (that was not dependent on Adi Da’s personally continued psycho-physical embodiment)?
How does this editorial serve humanity when in effect it communicates a conclusion that "brings an end" to the possibility for "Bright" Divine Self Realization Process being enabled now and into the future and becoming fully incarnate here as a True culture?
Link to Julie asking a question of Adi Da about, after Mahasamadhi:
Listen to Adi Speaking (March 29, 1994)
“I Will Be Incarnated Countlessly Through My Devotees”
